State ex rel. Evans v. Columbus Department of Law
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Evans asserts that he is entitled to the requested writ of mandamus pursuant to R.C. 2935.09. For the reasons that follow, we find this contention to be meritless and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
First, as the court of appeals correctly held, R.C. 2935.09 does not mandate prosecution of all offenses charged by affidavit. Although R.C. 2935.09 provides that a “private citizen having knowledge of the facts” shall file with a judge, clerk of court, or magistrate an affidavit charging an offense committed in order to cause the arrest or prosecution of a person charged, it must be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Strothers v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Murr v. MeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1987
3Cited by17 opinions
- State ex rel. Portage Lakes Edn. Assn., OEA/NEA v. State Emp. Relations Bd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Bunting v. Styer (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State ex rel. Whittaker v. Lucas Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- State ex rel. Boylen v. HarmonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State ex rel. Lee v. MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.