Legal Opinion

In re Virgin Islands Bar Ass'n Committee

Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands

Decided October 26, 2012No. S. Ct. Misc. No. 2012-0014PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

(October 26, 2012)

2Per curiam

This matter comes before the Court pursuant to a petition filed by the Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee of the Virgin Islands Bar Association (“UPLC”). In its petition, the UPLC contends that Kenth W. Rogers, Esq., a member of the Virgin Islands Bar, engaged in the unauthorized practice of law while suspended for failure to complete the requisite continuing legal education (“CLE”) hours required by Supreme Court Rule 208(b)(1). For the reasons that follow, we dismiss the petition and refer the matter to the Ethics and Grievance Committee of the…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Government of Virgin Islands v. GereauCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bryan v. FawkesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  2. Walters v. WaltersSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  3. In re ReynoldsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
  4. Ottley v. Estate of BellSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  5. Virgin Islands Narcotics Strike Force v. Government of Virgin Islands Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API