Legal Opinion
People v. Jack
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 22, 1997No. A076816PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WALKER, J.
Michael P. Jack appeals from a final conviction following a plea of guilty to possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)). He contends that his motion to suppress evidence, brought pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5, 1 should have been granted, and the charges against him dismissed.
Facts
On April 16, 1994, appellant’s parole officer discovered that appellant did not live at the address he had listed as his residence address. As a result, on May 17, 1994, the Department of Corrections (CDC) recommended to the Board of Prison Terms (BPT) that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re BowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- In Re NesperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- In Re RoaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- In Re RuzickaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re NunezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- In re StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- O'Keeffe v. RimmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- O'Keeffe v. RimmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- People v. Moore CA6California Court of Appeal · 2015