Legal Opinion

In Re Nunez

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 2009No. G040377PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARONSON, J.

Antonio de Jesus Nuñez filed a petition for habeas corpus in the California Supreme Court on grounds, inter alia, that his sentence of life in prison without parole (LWOP) for kidnapping for ransom (Pen. Code, § 209, subd. (a)) 1 —an offense he committed when he was 14 years old—■ constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment or, alternatively, cruel or unusual punishment in violation of article I, section 17 of the California Constitution. Concluding Nuñez established a prima facie case for relief, the Supreme Court ordered Nuñez’s prison custodian to…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Walker v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Dearcey Stewart v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. People v. MendezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Julius Robinson v. G. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. P. v. Perez CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API