Legal Opinion

O'Keeffe v. Rimmer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 7, 2009No. 07-15831Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Demian Trevor O’Keeffe, a former California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various claims, including due process violations in connection with parole decisions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Beene v. Terhune, 380 F.3d 1149, 1150 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on O’Keeffe’s claims that defendants violated his due process rights in connection with the parole…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Robert Eugene Beene v. Cal A. Terhune James Nielson Roger Schaufel J.M. Widener, Parole AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. People v. JackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API