Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Helms

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1975No. Appeals, Nos. 1066 and 1171PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

The appellees, Robert Helms and Kenneth Spacil, were charged with conspiracy to fraudulently obtain telecommunications service and conspiracy to possess and possession of instruments or devices used to achieve theft of communications service.1 Both appellees moved to suppress evidence obtained by security personnel of the Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania contending that such evidence was obtained in violation of the Pennsylvania anti-wiretapping statute.2 The lower court granted the suppression motions and the Commonwealth appealed.3

The facts reveal that an employee…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. United States v. Richard Michael King, AKA Richard HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Alvin Bubis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrachbillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. BrachbillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. Mathis, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County1991
  4. Commonwealth v. Moyer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1984
  5. In re Search of Offices of Action Mental Health, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API