Legal Opinion

Peay v. Morton

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided July 27, 1983No. 82-3242PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOHN T. NIXON, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this cause of action requesting, alternatively, a permanent injunction and damages for copyright infringement under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq., or a declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 that plaintiff is the sole owner of the copyright in the musical composition at issue in this case. Pending is defendants’ motion to dismiss or for summary judgment based on their contention that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and that the plaintiff failed to join an indispensable party. Because this Court has…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. T. B. Harms Company v. Edward Eliscu and Ross Jungnickel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  5. De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Susan Mary Kamen v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Patricia McDonald and Carol BuckhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. The Saturday Evening Post Company and the Curtis Publishing Company v. Rumbleseat Press, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Severe Records, LLC v. RichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  4. Lee v. Mt. Ivy Press, L.P.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  5. P & D International v. Halsey Publishing Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API