Legal Opinion
McNary v. Guaranty Trust Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 27, 1934No. 3969PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAHN, District Judge.
Three motions have been filed in the above-entitled cause: (1) Motion to transfer cause to equity docket; (2) motion of plaintiff for a judgment of default upon petition; and (3) motion of defendant for extension of time to move, plead, or demur.
The ease has been docketed as a suit at law. The plaintiff is a committee acting for the-protection of bondholders of first mortgage leasehold bonds of 269 Madison Ave- hue, Inc. The latter company issued $950,-000 of bonds which have been retired to $851,000 of bonds which axe still outstanding. The committee represents $673,000…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Supreme Tribe of Ben-Hur v. CaubleSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Richland v. CrandallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Smith v. AbbateDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- LUKETICH v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2020