Legal Opinion
Richland v. Crandall
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 4, 1966No. 65 Civ. 1625PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANSFIELD, District Judge.
A threshold question is whether plaintiffs are entitled to a jury trial of their claims against all defendants except The Chase Manhattan Bank pursuant to plaintiffs’ demand made on December 20, 1965. 1 The defendants (other than Chase) have moved to strike the demand on the grounds (1) that the action is exclusively equitable, and (2) that any right to a jury has been waived.
The action represents the consolidation of four suits brought by stockholders of the George A. Fuller Company 2 (“Fuller” herein) both derivatively on its behalf, individually on their…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- LaMarca v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,357 Bertha Arber and Ann Arber Broek, Cross-Appellees v. Essex Wire Corporation and Walter F. Probst, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Richland v. CrandallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.