Ahrenberg Mechanical Contracting, Inc v Howlett
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is a contested matter. However, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal on the ground that, by approving an order “as to form and content,” counsel for the appellants had unwittingly allowed entry of a consent judgment. We reverse the order of dismissal and remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the appeal.
i
The plaintiff is a subcontractor. The defendants are a general contractor and the owner of the property on which work was being performed. Saying that it had not been fully paid, the subcontractor sued the general contractor and the property owner in district…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kirn v. IoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Herman v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Chilton's, Inc. v. Wilmington Apartment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Trupski v. KanarMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Longo v. MinchellaMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ross v. Auto Club GroupMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Dresden v. Detroit MacOmb Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Roberts v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Trahey v. City of InksterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Freedman v. BrutzkusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.