Legal Opinion
William v. Martin, as Trustee in Bankruptcy for Aerocolor, Inc., Dba Aero Press Co., a Corporation v. Crocker-Citizens National Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 3, 1965No. 19670_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MADDEN, Judge:
Aerocolor, Inc., was in bankruptcy in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. The ap-pellee herein, Crocker-Citizens National Bank, applied to the referee in bankruptcy for leave to exercise the bank’s power of sale under a chattel mortgage which the bank claimed to have received from Aerocolor before Aerocolor became bankrupt. The referee in bankruptcy denied the bank’s application, stating several reasons for the denial. We shall discuss only one of those reasons, the failure of the officers of Aerocolor to acknowledge, in the presence of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Baltimore v. StaakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Boswell v. First National Bank of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
- Merced Bank v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Noyes v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McAllester v. Aldridge (In Re Anderson)District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
- 11 Collier bankr.cas.2d 648, Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,061 in Re Hartman Paving, Inc., South Berkeley Lumber & Supply, Inc., Debtors-In-Possession. Thomas G. Pyne v. Hartman Paving, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Clements v. SniderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Clements v. SniderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Pyne v. Hartman Paving, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984