Legal Opinion
Pyne v. Hartman Paving, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 2, 1984No. 83-1443PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Circuit Judge:
Thomas G. Pyne appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s denial of relief from the automatic stay imposed under 11 U.S.C. § 362. We reverse.
I
In August of 1979 Pyne conveyed real estate and several mobile homes by deed to the Hartman Paving Corporation [Hartman] in exchange for a promissory note. The deed was recorded in the office of the Clerk of the County Commission of Berkeley County, West Virginia. The promissory note required Hartman to pay Pyne the principal sum of $88,000.00 at the rate of 10% interest in 240 monthly installments. To…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tavenner v. BarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
- Hastings v. VaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- Central Trust Co. v. CookWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
- Dussaume v. BurnettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
- Shults v. MooreU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1839
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- 11 Collier bankr.cas.2d 648, Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,061 in Re Hartman Paving, Inc., South Berkeley Lumber & Supply, Inc., Debtors-In-Possession. Thomas G. Pyne v. Hartman Paving, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- AFB & T v. Sullivan (In Re Sullivan)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2010