Legal Opinion
Jaramillo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 3, 1935No. 1192PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
On August 31, 1934, appellants and three others — Frank Brown, Vivian Tafoya and Robert Montoya — were indicted for conspiring to violate the statute prohibiting the sale of liquor to Indians (25 USCA § 241). Overt acts, setting up three separate sales from appellants to their co-conspirators and from them to Indians, were alleged to have been committed on August 16 and August 24, 1934. All were found guilty.
The proof established that appellants were running a place in Gallup where food and liquors were legally dispensed, and where a crap-game was operated back of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wiborg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Van Gorder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Bogileno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Lamento v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Caldwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ben Corbin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Suhay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Wilder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.