Legal Opinion

Porter v. Flick

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1900No. 11,662PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Holmes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

This proceeding in error brings here for review an order made at chambers by Hon. E. P. Holmes, one of the j'udges of the district court for the third judicial district, reversing a decision of the secretary of state touching the right of a new political organization to use the party name which it had adopted. Defendants in error contend that this court has no appellate jurisdiction in *775this class of cases, and that this proceeding must, for that reason, be dismissed. The argument is (1) that the legislature has made no provision for reviewing decisions made at chambers by judges of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schuler v. HoganIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People ex rel. McGaffey v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sartin v. SnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. HammCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  3. State ex rel. Baird v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. State ex rel. Meissner v. McHughNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State ex rel. Offill v. HallowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API