Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Baird v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 26, 1923No. 25,069PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

This is an original action in quo warranto to oust the defendant, who is probate judge pro tem. of Wyandotte county, from solemnizing marriages. The plaintiff states that the defendant has solemnized hundreds of marriages and denies his authority so to do.

It is proper to first give consideration to the power and duties of the probate court and the judge thereof.

Section 1, of article III of the constitution reads as follows:

“The judicial power of this state shall be vested in a supreme court, district courts, probate courts, justices of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Intoxicating-Liquor CasesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. State v. DureinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Von Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Renfrow v. RenfrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  5. Michigan Central Railroad v. Northern Indiana RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1851

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hunt v. EddySupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  2. State Ex Rel. Wright v. HeadrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Gillaspie v. E. W. Blair Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. State Highway Commission v. HurshOregon Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API