Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Meissner v. McHugh

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1930No. 27754PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is a special proceeding before a justice of the supreme court, under section 2119, Comp. St. 1922, as amended by section 3, ch. 108, Laws 1925, wherein Richard C. Meissner, as relator, seeks a summary order against the respondent, William D. McHugh, Jr., and Albert E. May, election commissioner and deputy election commissioner of Douglas county, respectively, to accept relator’s acceptance of a nomination for county attorney of Douglas county by virtue of a petition filed and alleged to be in conformity to "the provisions of section 2098, Comp. St. 1922, as amended by chapter 98, Laws…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Porter v. FlickNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Vennum v. HustonNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Enos v. HanffNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Burgess-Nash Building Co. v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Peterson v. ShivelyNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Platte Valley Irrigation District v. BryanNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Nebraska Republican Party v. Shively - special releaseNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Nebraska Republican Party v. Shively - special releaseNebraska Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API