Kuhle v. Lecy Chiropractic
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1.] The South Dakota Department of Labor (Department) determined that Kami Kuhle (Kuhle) was not entitled to workers’ compensation benefits from Lecy Chiropractic Clinic (Clinic) because she failed to provide timely notice. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Kuhle was thirty-three years old at the time of this hearing. She attended high school, but only completed the tenth grade. Kuhle received her general equivalency diploma in 1987 or 1988. Later, she studied biology at Black Hills State University and phlebotomy at Western Dakota Technical Institute. Kuhle also obtained a degree as a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Day v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Schuck v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Enger v. FMCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Tieszen v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Kassube v. Dakota LoggingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Huber v. Department of Public SafetySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Vollmer v. Wal-Mart Store, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Wise v. Brooks Construction ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- McNeil v. Superior Siding, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Baier v. Dean Kurtz Construction Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.