Legal Opinion

Tieszen v. John Morrell & Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1995No. 18544PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VON WALD, Circuit Judge.

Randy L. Tieszen (Tieszen) appeals adverse determination of worker’s compensation benefits. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Tieszen first became employed for John Morell & Company (Morrell) in May 1987 as a strike replacement worker. He left Mor-rell in July 1987 because of threats made on his life by striking workers. Tieszen was rehired by Morrell on August 12, 1987, and he was assigned to the pork kill area of the plant as a hog splitter, which was the same type of work that he had performed at Mor-rell during his previous employment by them.

In September of 1987, Tieszen…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Application of Northwestern Bell Tel. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In Re the State & City Sales Tax Liability of Quality Service Railcar Repair Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. McKeever Custom Cabinets v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  5. In Re the Appeal of TempletonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Loewen v. Hyman Freightways, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Enger v. FMCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Zoss v. United Building Centers, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Vaughn v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Miller v. Lake Area HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API