Maxfield v. Simmons
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison
Paul E. Simmons, the defendant and third-party plaintiff, appeals from an order of the circuit court of Saline County which dismissed with prejudice his amended third-party complaint against the third-party defendants Walter DeNeal, d/b/a DeNeal Building Supply, and Jesse B. Holt, Inc. (“Holt”). The trial court expressly found no just reason for delaying an appeal; hence we have jurisdiction of this appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 304(a) (73 Ill. 2d R. 304(a)). The sole issue is whether the trial court properly dismissed the amended third-party complaint. We affirm.
For the purposes of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reynolds v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
- Rome v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Board of Education of High School District No. 88 v. Joseph J. Duffy Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968
- Bray v. Illinois National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Talandis Construction Corp. v. Illinois Building AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Anixter Bros, Inc. v. Cen. Steel & Wire Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant, Cross v. Chicago Eastern Corporation, Defendant-Counterplaintiff, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Maxfield v. SimmonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Bates & Rogers Construction Corp. v. North Shore Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Hefler v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.