Legal Opinion

Hefler v. Wright

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 9, 1984No. 5-83-0357PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE WELCH

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs Gary and Sharon Hefler brought suit against defendant Bill Wright, doing business""as Bill Wright Construction, alleging that he built their house in an unworkmanlike manner and breached an implied warranty of fitness or habitability. Specifically, they complained that there were cracks in the wall and ceiling, certain trusses were loose, the soffit was separated from the kitchen cabinets, and the dry wall and the center beam of the house were not properly installed. Subsequently, the plaintiffs sought to amend their…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Petersen v. Hubschman Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Tassan v. United Development Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Park v. SohnIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Minton v. the Richards Group of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Maxfield v. SimmonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. VonHoldt v. Barba & Barba Construction, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. 1324 W. Pratt Condominium Ass'n v. Platt Construction Group Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. Hoke v. BeckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. McClure v. SennstromAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. 1324 W. Pratt Condominium Association v. Platt Construction GroupAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API