State v. Gates
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
TANAKA, J.
Defendant Richard Holland Gates (Defendant) appeals his jury conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor (DUI) in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 291-4(a)(l) and -4(a)(2) (1985). Defendant contends that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence the test result obtained from the use of an intoxilyzer model 401 IAS (Intoxilyzer), a breath-testing instrument. He also contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal 2 made after the close of the State’s case. We hold that these…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. VegaOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. HalemanuHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- State v. SouzaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1987
- Keel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. VlietHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. FerrerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. YoungHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. WetzelHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. KemperHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.