Legal Opinion
State v. Johnson
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
Decided April 30, 1986PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCOTT, Judge.
The defendant was charged with driving under the influence of an intoxicant. He filed a motion to suppress the results of a breath test which was administered to determine his blood alcohol content. The trial judge granted the motion. The state sought and was granted an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Rule 9, T.R.A.P. The sole issue is whether the trial judge erred in granting the motion to suppress the evidence of the breath test.
The trial judge concluded that the Auto-Intoximeter model AI-1000 breath testing device “does not employ methods or techniques generally…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Braziel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- People v. GowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. StephensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- McDaniel v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. SaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. SensingTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.