Legal Opinion

Kleman v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 18, 1916No. 2147PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania; W. H. Seward Thomson, Judge. Action at law by the Anheuser-Busch Brewing Association against John P. Kleman. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

The transaction out of which this case arose appears in the opinion of this court when the case was last here for review. 219 Fed. 522, 135 C. C. A. 272. Only a brief outline of the facts is necessary to a consideration of the questions raised by this writ of error.

Kleman (the defendant below) owned a saloon property in Pittsburgh, in which he had conducted the liquor business. He sold the business to Wiese and received in part payment Wiese’s notes endorsed by the Tube City Brewing Company. Aside from his obligation to the Tube City Brewing Company for its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  2. Paul v. StackhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  3. Eilbert v. FinkbeinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  4. Hewes v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  5. Goldsmith v. StockerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Trapp v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  2. Easter v. Kass-Berger, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Cantrell v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Gray v. Devers Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Hall v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API