Legal Opinion
U-Haul International, Inc. v. Jartran, Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided February 17, 1981No. Civ. 80-454 PHX-EHCPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CARROLL, District Judge.
I am called on to decide whether a stipulated preliminary injunction preventing certain cost-comparison advertising should be extended to cover allegedly false and deceptive advertising involving equipment qualities of the advertiser or claimed comparisons with a competitor.
For reasons set forth in this Opinion, an Amended Preliminary Injunction will issue, although not to the extent sought by Plaintiff.
THE PARTIES
Plaintiff U-Haul International, Inc., (U-Haul) brought this action against Jartran, Inc., (Jartran), JAR Corporation (JAR), James…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- The W. E. Bassett Company v. Revlon, Inc., the W. E. Bassett Company v. Revlon, Inc., (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Johnson & Johnson v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Pittsburgh Press Club v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Southland Sod Farms v. Stover Seed Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Southland Sod Farms v. Stover Seed Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Johnson & Johnson v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Cook, Perkiss And Liehe, Inc. v. Northern California Collection Service Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. Shoshone River Power, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.