Legal Opinion

Miller v. Ideal Cement Co.

District Court, D. Wyoming

Decided March 15, 1963No. Civ. No. 4647PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERR, District Judge.

In this action the carrier seeks to recover undercharges in the amount of |39,728.00 plus interest and costs, allegedly due from the shipper because the cairier failed to charge and collect the tariff under which the shipments were made. This court has original jurisdiction of this proceeding arising under the Acts of Congress regulating commerce, namely, 49 U.S.C. §§ 316, 317 and 304(a). Title 28 U.S.C. § 1337; Bernstein Bros. Pipe and Machinery Co. v. Denver R. G. W. R. Co., 10 Cir., 193 F.2d 441 (1951).

Each party has moved for summary judgment relying on affidavits and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Lowden v. Simonds-Shields-Lonsdale Grain Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. James R. Madler v. L. Robert Artoe, Doing Business as Lee Artoe Carbon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. Pan American Mail Line, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  3. ELGIN, JOLIET AND EASTERN RAILWAY CO. v. Benj. Harris & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1965
  4. Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Del. v. EddyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Kansas Power & Light Co. v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API