Legal Opinion
James R. Madler v. L. Robert Artoe, Doing Business as Lee Artoe Carbon Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 28, 1974No. 73-1371PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTINGS, Senior Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court dismissing an amended complaint seeking recovery of unpaid interstate motor freight charges for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We reverse.
The amended complaint alleges that plaintiff Madler is the assignee of the claim of Consolidated Freightways Corporation of Delaware (Consolidated) in the amount of $989.84 against defendant Lee Artoe Carbon Company (Artoe). The claim consists of unpaid freight charges incurred by Artoe as a result of transportation services performed in interstate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mulford v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Turner, Dennis & Lowry Lumber Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bernstein Bros. Pipe & MacHinery Co. v. Denver & R.G.W.R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Thurston Motor Lines, Inc. v. Jordan K. Rand, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Western Transportation Company v. Wilson and Company, Inc. And Wilson Foods CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Maritime Service Corp. v. Sweet Brokerage De Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Chicago and North Western Transportation Company v. The Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Allen v. Spiegel, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.