Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Landis

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1938No. 3220PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Ducker, J.:

This is a motion to strike portions of the record on appeal. An examination of the record reveals that the motion is addressed to parts of the bill of exceptions. Respondent Martha W. Landis claims that the matter objected to is immaterial and therefore has no place in a bill of exceptions. If, in fact, such matter was erroneously included in the bill of exceptions, we have no power to strike it.

This court has no general or revisory power over a bill of exceptions. When settled in the manner and within the time prescribed by law, the bill of exceptions becomes a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hyde v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. In re GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Landers v. LandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Vance v. Superior Court of Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Cox v. DelmasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dangberg Holdings Nevada, L.L.C. v. Douglas CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Nevada Transfer & Warehouse Co. v. PetersonNevada Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State v. PanseyNevada Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Lopez v. Merit InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  5. McLaney v. Fortune Operating Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API