Ryan v. Landis
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Ducker, J.:
This is a motion to strike portions of the record on appeal. An examination of the record reveals that the motion is addressed to parts of the bill of exceptions. Respondent Martha W. Landis claims that the matter objected to is immaterial and therefore has no place in a bill of exceptions. If, in fact, such matter was erroneously included in the bill of exceptions, we have no power to strike it.
This court has no general or revisory power over a bill of exceptions. When settled in the manner and within the time prescribed by law, the bill of exceptions becomes a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hyde v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- In re GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Landers v. LandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Vance v. Superior Court of Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Cox v. DelmasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dangberg Holdings Nevada, L.L.C. v. Douglas CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1999
- Nevada Transfer & Warehouse Co. v. PetersonNevada Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. PanseyNevada Supreme Court · 1942
- Lopez v. Merit InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- McLaney v. Fortune Operating Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.