Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Boyd

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided February 17, 2000No. ACM 33483PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SPISAK, Senior Judge:

The appellant pled guilty to damaging and stealing military property, wrongfully using three different controlled substances, and conduct unbecoming an officer in violation of Articles 108, 121, 112a and 133, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 908, 921, 912a, 933. His approved sentence consists of a dismissal, confinement for 80 days, and forfeiture of $215.00 pay per month for 3 months.

The appellant raises three errors for our consideration: (1) The military judge erred when he instructed that military confinement facilities must make mental health care professionals…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. BoydCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  2. United States v. FriedmannUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  3. United States v. GalloUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  4. United States v. ButcherUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  5. United States v. CrazeUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API