Legal Opinion
Blaine v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 6, 1993No. C9-92-1444, C0-92-1445PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellants Robert Blaine, William W. Arndt, and John Weins commenced actions against respondent Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 by serving respondent’s superintendent and interim superintendent of schools. The district court issued orders granting respondent’s motions to dismiss for insufficient service of process. Subsequently, the court issued amended orders for judgment of dismissal.
Appellants have appealed from the judgments, claiming they properly served the superintendents of schools. Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeals, claiming…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Hardy v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Northern Petrochemical Co. v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Larson v. New Richland Care CenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Patterson v. Wu Family Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Manteuffel v. City of North St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995