Legal Opinion

Horton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1977No. 37260PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant based upon a jury verdict. Plaintiffs sued defendant for the theft loss of an automobile under an insurance policy issued by defendant.

Plaintiffs make no attack upon the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. Their basic attack is that as a matter of law they had an insurable interest in the vehicle, and since that was defendant’s only defense, they were entitled to a directed verdict. Certain trial errors are also claimed, some of which are determined by the basic issue raised.

We review the facts in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Connecticut Fire Insurance v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  2. Kelso v. KelsoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  3. Still v. Travelers Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. Hessen v. Iowa Automobile Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. Barnett v. London Assurance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1926

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Metro Auto Auction v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  2. Annin v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Faygal v. Shelter Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Oliver v. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Duncan v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API