Legal Opinion

Kyser v. Kasson Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 2008No. Docket 272516 and 273964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJansen, J.

Following a bench trial, the circuit court entered an order permitting plaintiff to mine gravel on her property and enjoining defendant from interfering with plaintiffs gravel-mining operation, notwithstanding a township zoning ordinance that purported to disallow gravel mining on plaintiffs land. The circuit court also denied plaintiffs requests for costs and sanctions against defendant. Both parties now appeal as of right, we consolidate the appeals, and we affirm.

I

The salient facts of this case are not in serious dispute. Significant gravel deposits underlie defendant Kasson Township.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Maldonado v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Kirk v. Tyrone TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. City of North Muskegon v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Chapdelaine v. SochockiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Marshall Lasser, PC v. GeorgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kyser v. Kasson TwpMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Kyser v. Kasson TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Kyser v. Kasson TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Kyser v. Kasson TwpMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API