Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kyser v. Kasson Township

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2009No. 136680PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1DissentCorrigan, J.

Today’s decision denies this Court the opportunity to inquire about the justification for past decisions of this Court that have read into the law provisions that were never placed there by the Legislature itself. As a consequence, the general rule of judicial deference to the decisions of local zoning authorities has been altered with regard to the extraction of natural resources, and the judiciary has been afforded a considerably greater role in questioning the judgments of such authorities and effectively acting as a super zoning commission.

I respectfully dissent from the order denying…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. City of North Muskegon v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. Paris TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Silva v. Ada TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henry v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Henry v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API