Legal Opinion
Mark Anthony Gonzalez v. Nathanajah Breitenbach, et al.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided August 17, 2026No. 2:25-cv-01080Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 MARK ANTHONY GONZALEZ, Case No. 2:25-cv-01080-APG-BNW 4 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO 5 v. DISMISS 6 NATHANJAH BREITENBACH, et al., [ECF No. 10] 7 Respondents. 8 I. Summary 9 In this habeas action, the respondents move to dismiss Mark Anthony Gonzalez’s petition 10 for a writ of habeas corpus under
28 U.S.C. § 2254
on the grounds that his challenges to the 11 validity of his guilty plea are not cognizable and are wholly unexhausted. ECF No. 10. For the 12 reasons explained below, I grant the motion to…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.