Legal Opinion

Ditmars v. Interchemical Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 14, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Joseph L., C. C. J.

This is on a motion for bill of particulars demanded by the plaintiff concerning the answers set up by the defendants.

The suit against the defendant Chambón Corporation sounds in contract, and the suit against the defendant Inter-chemical Corporation sounds in tort.

As appears from argument of counsel, both defendants have set up similar defenses, namely: (a) that the plaintiff canceled and terminated the agreement upon which suit is brought, (b) That the plaintiff waived the provisions of a certain paragraph of the memorandum of agreement upon which suit is brought,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dwight v. . Germania Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Wigler v. Public Service Co-ordinated Transport Co.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1932
  3. Billy v. TatarskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Flotill Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1945
  2. Giacumbo v. Public Service Co-ordinated TransportHudson County Superior Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API