Legal Opinion

Rives v. Mincks Hotel Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 20, 1934No. 25124PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Tulsa county, by Claude G. Rives, Jr., hereinafter referred to as intervener, against Mincks Hotel Company, Advance Operating Company, B. E. Chartier, I. S. Mincks, and Remington Rogers, hereinafter referred to as defendants, from an order of said court striking from the files an application .of intervener to discharge a receiver.

This is an issue growing out of a controversy which involves the operation of the Mincks Hotel.

On March 16, 1932, Henry L. Fist and E. E. Chartier filed their third amended petition against the Mincks Hotel Company, I. S.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Freedman's Saving & Trust Co. v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Teal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Sullivan v. . RossonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Hall v. GoldsworthySupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Coursey v. FairchildSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Hart v. BingmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America v. Oklahoma Tower Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. Virginia Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WoodDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API