STATE, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Johns
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RABINO WITZ, Justice.
The central issue in this appeal is whether the superior court correctly upheld the Alaska Workmen’s Compensation Board’s decision that appellee Johns’ injuries arose out of and in the course of his employment. We affirm.
In R. C. A. Serv. Co. v. Liggett 1 this court adopted the rule that
injuries occurring off the employer’s premises while the employee is going to or coming from work do not arise in the course of his employment.
At the same time it was recognized that:
There are of course exceptions to the rule, one of them being the ‘special er rand’ exception. But even in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Thornton v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Kobe v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Northern Corporation v. SaariAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Serrano v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hinojosa v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Luth v. Rogers and Babler Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Beauchamp v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Laborers & Hod Carriers Union, Local No. 341 v. GroothuisAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.