Legal Opinion

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Prive

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 10, 1979No. 297-78PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In a collection action, the trial court rendered judgment for the defendant with respect to an indebtedness, undisputed as to liability or amount. He had sent, and plaintiff had cashed, a check for a lesser amount with a notation of payment of account in full. Curran v. Bray Wood Heel Co., 116 Vt. 21, 68 A.2d 712 (1949), was relied upon as supporting this result.

Curran deals with an obligation disputed as to amount. Id. at 25, 68 A.2d at 715. The rule applicable to the facts found is stated in Crosby’s Admrs. v. Naatz, 98 Vt. 226, 228-29, 126 A. 547, 548 (1924):

The payment of an amount less…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curran v. Bray Wood Heel Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949
  2. In Re Estate of BoyntonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1959
  3. Crosby's Admrs. v. NaatzSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Larson v. CandlishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  2. Adams v. B.P.C., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  3. United States ex rel. Las Vegas Building Materials, Inc. v. BernadotDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API