Crosby's Admrs. v. Naatz
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
The administrators of the estate of Charles R. Crosby are seeking to recover for goods sold and delivered to the defendant. The trial was by court, and the plaintiffs had judgment on the facts found. The case is here on the defendant’s exception to the judgment, and the only question raised is whether on the findings he should have prevailed on his plea of accord and satisfaction.
The defendant lives at South Newbury, Vermont, and in the lifetime of Mr. Crosby acted as his agent in the grain and feed business at that place. After Mr. Crosby’s death in May, 1921, the defendant acted as the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morgan v. GouldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Brunswick & Western Railway Co. v. ClemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- King v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- McDaniels v. LaphamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
- Bellows v. SowlesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nelson Et Ux. v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Greenwood v. LamsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Hammonds, Inc. v. FlandersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- Reed v. Vt. Accident Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939
- Adams v. B.P.C., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.