Legal Opinion
McQueen v. Woodstream Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 9, 2009No. Civil Action 05-2068 (RMU)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Granting The Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss For Lack Of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs fraudulent misrepresentation claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The defendant asserts that the plaintiff cannot recover sufficient damages to satisfy the amount-in-controversy requirement to maintain this diversity action. The court concludes that the plaintiffs compensatory damages are limited to what he specifically gave up in reliance on the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Simon Bronner v. Lisa DugganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- Lurie v. Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- McIntosh v. GilleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Griffith v. Educap Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Lemus v. Grover Montano Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.