Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Educap Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 27, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2016-1541Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATASHA GRIFFITH, Plaintiff, v. No. 16-cv-1541 (DLF) EDUCAP, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, see Griffith’s Mot., Dkt. 38; EduCap’s Cross-Mot., Dkt. 41, and their supplemental briefing on the basis for this Court’s jurisdiction, see EduCap’s Suppl. Br., Dkt. 47; Griffith’s Suppl. Br., Dkt. 48. For the reasons that follow, the Court will dismiss the case without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction and deny the cross-motions for summary judgment as moot. I.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API