Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Yardney Electric Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 21, 1985No. 2832PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
In this case, we are called upon to decide whether the principle articulated by Sheets v. Teddy’s Frosted Foods, Inc., 179 Conn. 471, 427 A.2d 385 (1980), applies to the facts alleged by the plaintiff in the third and fourth counts of his complaint. We hold that it does, and that the plaintiff has stated viable causes of action in those counts.
The plaintiff’s complaint is in six counts. The first and second counts purport to allege claims against his former employer, the defendant Yardney Electric Corporation (Yardney), and its parent corporation, the defendant Whittaker Corporation…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Alarm Applications Co. v. Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Amodio v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Johnson v. Kreiser's, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Battista v. United Illuminating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Fairfield Lease Corp. v. Romano's Auto ServiceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Johnson v. Chesebrough-Pond's USA Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.