Legal Opinion

Rothschild v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 27, 1998No. 96-40275PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO DEFENDANT ON ITS COUNTERCLAIM

GADOLA, District Judge.

On May 1, 1996, plaintiffs John J. Rothschild, James L. Donahue, and Jero Engineering filed the instant action against defendant Ford Motor Company alleging two counts of patent infringement, as well as claims of unfair competition and unjust enrichment. Presently before this court is the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on all of the plaintiffs’ claims. For the following reasons, the defendant’s motion will be granted.

FACTS

Sa…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mike's Train House, Inc. v. Lionel, L.L.C., Korea Brass and Yoo Chan YangCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Nedschroef Detroit Corp. v. Bemas Enterprises LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
  3. Wilson v. Continental Development Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1999
  4. Compuware Corp. v. International Business MacHinesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  5. Rainbow Nails Enterprises, Inc. v. Maybelline, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API