Mayhew v. Howell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*271ORR, Judge.
Plaintiff contends that the Full Commission erred in affirming and adopting the opinion and award of the Deputy Commissioner who concluded that N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-19 (Supp. 1990) does not apply in this case. For the reasons set forth below, we disagree and affirm the opinion and award of the Full Commission.
“The well-established rule concerning the role of the appellate court in reviewing an appeal from the Industrial Commission is that the Court ‘is limited to a determination of (1) whether the findings of fact are supported by competent evidence, and (2) whether the conclusions…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barham v. Food World, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Greene v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Beach v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Withers v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Richards v. Nationwide HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Purser v. Heatherlin PropertiesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Williams v. ARL, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Zocco v. United States, Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1992
- Gobble v. International Paper Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2002
- Kenion v. Maple View FarmNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.