Legal Opinion

Mayhew v. Howell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1991No. 9010IC548PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*271ORR, Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the Full Commission erred in affirming and adopting the opinion and award of the Deputy Commissioner who concluded that N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-19 (Supp. 1990) does not apply in this case. For the reasons set forth below, we disagree and affirm the opinion and award of the Full Commission.

“The well-established rule concerning the role of the appellate court in reviewing an appeal from the Industrial Commission is that the Court ‘is limited to a determination of (1) whether the findings of fact are supported by competent evidence, and (2) whether the conclusions…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barham v. Food World, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Greene v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Beach v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Withers v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Richards v. Nationwide HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Purser v. Heatherlin PropertiesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Williams v. ARL, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Zocco v. United States, Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1992
  4. Gobble v. International Paper Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2002
  5. Kenion v. Maple View FarmNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API