Legal Opinion

Gobble v. International Paper Co.

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided May 22, 2002No. 1:00CV00527Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BEATY, District Judge.

This case comes before the Court on Plaintiff Chad Franklin Gobble and Plaintiff Patricia Jane Duggan Gobble’s (together, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Document # 34], In greater detail, Plaintiffs request summary judgment as to Defendant International Paper Company’s (“Defendant” or “International Paper”) fourth affirmative defense, which asserts that Plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act, Va.Code Ann. § 65.2-307(A). For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Phoenix Savings and Loan, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  4. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. v. McReynoldsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  5. Fay M. Campbell v. Hewitt, Coleman & Associates, Incorporated Peoples Security Life Insurance Company, and Interiors, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API