In re Richter
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Hearing upon petition of Albert J. Kiehter for a writ of habeas corpus, and upon an application by the United States for a warrant for the removal of said llichter to the district of Alaska for trial upon a criminal charge.
1Opinion of the Court
SEAMAN, District Judge.
The inquiry upon this hearing is twofold: First, upon the writs of habeas corpus on behalf of the defendant; and, second, upon the application of the United States for a warrant for the removal of the defendant to the district of Alaska for trial. However restricted to jurisdictional questions under the writ, it is clear that the inquiry as to the grounds for issuing the warrant of removal is not thus limited. U. S. v. Towkes, 3 U. S. App. 247; 3 C. C. A. 394, 53 Fed. 13; Price v. McCarthy, 32 C. C. A. 162, 89 Fed. 84; In re Burldiard (opinion of Judge Dyer in this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- In Re Luis Oteiza Y CortesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Horner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Stevens v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. FowkesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Reass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Ex parte BlackDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1906
- United States v. GreenDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.