Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Goodell

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 15, 2005No. 32469-5-IIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*384f 1

Van Deren, A.C.J.

— Scott Goodell appeals the trial court’s order revising a court commissioner’s child support order. He asserts that the trial court erred by (1) not imputing income to his former wife, Cathie Goodell; (2) determining Scott’s income based on pay stubs that were not before the court commissioner; (3) refusing a deviation for Scott’s new child; (4) incorrectly computing health care expenses; and (5) awarding attorney fees of $1,000 to Cathie. We hold that the trial court erred in failing to impute income to Cathie and in considering income and expense information that was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of GriffinWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In re the Marriage of MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In re the Marriage of LeslieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. In Re Marriage of MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In re the Marriage of DoddCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Acord v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Perez v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. In re the Marriage of R.E.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. Angela Freeman v. Oscar FreemanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. Christopher James Burrows v. Alicia Ann De GonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API