Capital Properties, Inc. v. City of Providence
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTELL, Justice.
A Superior Court award of attorneys’ fees brings this protracted controversy before this Court for the third occasion. The defendant, City of Providence (the city), appeals from an award of costs and attorneys’ fees to the plaintiff, Capital Properties, Inc. (CPI). The city asserts that the motion justice erred in his interpretation of both Rhode Island and federal statutory law, and by finding that the court has the inherent authority to award attorneys’ fees. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.
Facts and Procedural History
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Accent Store Design, Inc. v. Marathon House, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Roe v. GelineauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Rhode Island Depositors Economic Protection Corp. v. Bowen Court AssociatesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- Capital Properties, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
- Heflin v. KoszelaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moore v. BallardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
- Union Station Associates v. RossiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- Aponik v. LauricellaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- Cashman Equipment Corporation, Inc. v. Cardi Corporation, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
- Cady v. Imc Mortgage CompanySuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.