Legal Opinion
Aponik v. Lauricella
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided March 29, 2004No. 2003-150-AppealPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The defendants, Joseph A. Lauricella and Charlene J. Thiel (defendants), appeal a Superior Court order confirming an arbitration award in favor of the plaintiff, Alexander E. Aponik, Jr. (Aponik or plaintiff), and granting costs and attorneys’ fees to the plaintiff. The defendants contend that the hearing justice erred in denying their motion to vacate, failing to stay the enforcement proceedings, and awarding attorneys’ fees and prejudgment interest to the plaintiff. In addition, the defendants argue that the hearing justice erred in confirming the award because the arbitrator ignored…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Jacinto v. EganSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Purvis Systems, Inc. v. American Systems Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Paola v. Commercial Union Assurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. GrabbertSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
- Westminster Construction Corp. v. PPG Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by24 opinions
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. BarrySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- Newman v. Valleywood Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Berkshire Wilton Partners, LLC v. Bilray Demolition Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
- Buttie v. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
- State of Rhode Island, Department of Corrections v. Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional OfficersSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.