Legal Opinion

Woodard v. Webster

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1897PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Cascade county. C. IL Benton, Judge. Action by Caroline Woodard against Charles M. Webster, administrator of the estate of Frank B. Tuttle, deceased. The trial resulted in favor of plaintiff, and defendant moved for a new trial on a statement of the case. From an order granting defendant a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

The controlling issue of this appeal is set forth in the following bill of exceptions in the statement on motion for new trial:

‘ ‘Be it remembered, and it is hereby certified as part of the record in said causé and of the statement on motion for a new trial, that on the 26th day of February, 1896, the defendant, by J. W. Stanton, Esq., his counsel, jxresented to the judge of said court for settlement the proposed statement and copy of amendments thereto on motion for anew trial; the plaintiff being represented by W. T. Pigott, Esq., his counsel, who appeared solely for the purpose of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Connor v. S. Cal. Motor Rd. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beach v. Spokane Ranch & Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Murray v. HauserMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Sheppard v. SheppardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Burns v. NaptonMontana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Parker v. BambergerUtah Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API