Legal Opinion

Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

Nabisco Brands, Inc. (Employer) appeals from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the decision of the Worker’s Compensation Judge (WCJ), which had granted the reinstatement petition of William Almara (Claimant).

On August 18, 1988, Claimant fell and injured his left elbow while working for Employer as a mixer’s helper. 1 Pursuant to a notice of compensation payable dated December 5,1988, Claimant received total disability benefits in the amount of $366.88 per week. On May 3, 1989, Claimant’s physician approved Claimant’s' return to work as a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. McCarthy v. Township of McCandlessCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Innovative Spaces v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Scobbie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ward v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Jordan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Barnett v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. J.A. Jones Construction Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Thomas v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API